There’s an expression ‘to know’, as in Abraham knew his wife
and she bore him a son, such that up until some point in history if I had said
that I knew this or that particular woman violence might have ensued. Now we
might think that we have moved beyond this kind of linguistic confusion, but we
really haven’t.
Every idea that each of us holds is a mixture of faith and
empirical reality. When we say we ‘know’ something, we are really saying that
we believe something – albeit with the backing of varying degrees of
information that we have attempted to empirically verify.
Reality appears to be hard. But every idea we have of reality
is soft. Although, once again, some ideas seem softer than others.
My point is this: we can’t avoid religious disputes. Even
when we think we are talking about solid things – science, for example - our direct
access to empirical information is limited.
It might seem simple to say that we now know that the sun is
an enormous nuclear reaction, a ridiculous number of hydrogen atoms too small
to be seen individually fusing into slightly bigger helium atoms. Each of these
particular atoms is still not visible to the naked eye, but in this process of
fusion, stupendous amounts of energy are released - heat, light and other radiation
and such. And, we might go on to say that all of this is happening at a location
in space an amazing distance away and, of course, that the ball of blazing gas
is also speeding along in the universe at an unbelievable rate of speed because
of an initial large bang and gravity and such.
And so we go on to blithely speak of a host of other supposedly
demonstrable facts mixed in with some imagined ideas and some concepts passed
down from people who say that they know.
But if I come up to you and say that it is fine if you want
to believe all that, but I believe that the sun is really simply a giant
flaming ball of metallic gold that has been lit on fire by celestial beings
with powers we can’t comprehend and is pulled across the sky by teams of
reindeer too small to be seen by the naked eye - your science wouldn’t have a
prayer.
In other words, if you think that if I truly believed my theory of flaming balls that I couldn’t
then also come up with an answer to every objection you could raise to my theory, you clearly haven’t been
paying attention to reality.
And by reality, I’m talking now primarily about the people
in it. We are all, more or less, religious nuts. We throw around expressions
like ‘I know you,’ and ‘you don’t know as much as you think,’ as if we are
making sense.
People used to say that even a broken clock is right twice a
day. But that was before digital. Still, even if only by accident, we can
concede that some of us might be right about something.
But here is my point, again: belief and faith must always be
considered in human discourse. And talking, that is, trying with words to bring
hard reality to bear in our considerations without beating each other up seems
to be smarter than the alternative.
But whatever you and I believe, however well we think our
ideas are established, in the end each of us will do what we do.
Reality seems to be objective and vast in space and time –
though some people will question this - and in all of this, we individual
humans are barely visible to the naked eye and are here for a only a limited
time, so it seems reasonable to me that each of us would go ahead and act on
what we know, however incomplete our empirical knowledge. Some of us will be
wrong. What we actually know, however, in any sense, biblical or otherwise, still
relies heavily on faith, and for all of our tools and repositories of tested
facts, what any of us really ‘know’ is still barely visible to the average individual human eye, so we can only anticipate many
more stupid religious arguments.
But arguments about what we believe are still better than the
alternative lethal altercations - so long as we can indeed limit ourselves to verbal
battles over words and ideas. I think the sun is a flaming ball, and I’ll leave
it at that, for now.
No comments:
Post a Comment